Multimorbidity of Elderly Persons in Urban and Rural Areas of The Nizhny Novgorod Region

VI Starodubov1, AN Edeleva1, TP Sabgayda1*

1Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics of Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 11 Dobrolyubova Str., Moscow, 127254, Russia


The article compares the prevalence of pathological changes in different organs and systems among city and rural residents of the next ages: elderly (60-74 years for men and 55-74 years for women), senile (75-84 years) and advanced (85 years and older) ages. The results of the continuous survey of all persons of the retirement age of one urban (7809 people) and two rural areas (14749) of the Nizhny Novgorod region were analyzed. The region is comparatively homogeneous in terms of the national composition of the population.

In the city, the number of chronic pathologies of different organs and systems per one person of elderly age are: 2.83 for man and 2.76 for woman of elderly ages, 3.06 and 3.07 respectively for senile ages, 2.71 and 2.75 of advanced ages. In rural areas, the analyzed indicators for men and women are respectively 1.64 and 1.58 for elderly ages, 1.84 and 1.78 for senile ages, 1.86 and 1.84 for advanced ages.

Demonstrating the difference in the phenotypic manifestations of the genes of predisposition to chronic diseases in old age between the city and village, the results make it possible to produce the following assumptions. First, better access to medical care does not guarantee the better health status of the elderly, while it contributes to an increase in the life expectancy of men. Second, in spite of better access to health care, urban lifestyle contributes to the accumulation of chronic diseases in population of a region. Third, if chronic pathology of three different classes of diseases presented, then the probability of a long life is fundamentally determined by the access to health care. Fourth, the probability of longevity is significantly reduced in result of illness by neoplasms, cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine or genitourinary diseases in ages of working or beginning of retirement period.


In the Russian Federation, morbidity statistics for elderly people are formed for general group of pensioners (males 60 years old and older, females 55 years old and older) in case of their coming to physicians. There is high proportion of ill-defined causes in the mortality structure for elderly people. It means that health status of some persons remains uncertain. At the same time, in order to implement programs aimed to preserve the health of elderly, it is necessary to have more data on their health status. Development of chronic diseases in old age is genetically conditioned. Since urban and rural living conditions are different (including access to medical care), it is possible to expect a different phenotypic manifestation of the weak link genes among elderly residents of city and village.

The article compares the prevalence of pathological changes in different organs and systems among city and rural residents of the next ages: elderly (60-74 years for men and 55-74 years for women), senile (75-84 years) and long-lived (advanced, 85 years and older) ages. The results of the continuous survey of all persons of the retirement age of one urban (7809 people) and two rural areas (14749) of the Nizhny Novgorod region were analyzed (Table 1). Diseases and health status were detected in process of clinical examination and interview using active identification of all persons of retirement age in population that attached to the medical organization. A comparison of the incidence of diseases in different sex-age groups of the population was carried out using the chi-square test.

Table 1: Number of persons of retirement age in urban and rural areas of the Nizhny Novgorod region
Age group City Rural areas
men women men women
Considered elderly
(60–74 years for men and 55–74 years for women)
1 664 3 810 3 662 5 135
Senile (75–84 years) 500 1 236 1 110 3 337
Long-lived
(85 years and older)
147 452 260 1 245
Total 2 311 5 498 5 032 9 717

Proportions of elderly men among all pensioners in urban and rural areas are close, while proportion of elderly rural women is more than urban one (p <0.0001).

The greatest ages were observed in city for men (114 vs 99 years old in rural areas) and in countryside for women (106 vs 116).

For analyzed population, the registered incidence is slightly less, than for country, while death rate exceeds the average Russian mortality (1984.1 vs 2003.7 per 1000 people).

During the period 2003 – 2016, in compare with death rates for the country, regional mortality decreased to a smaller extent for urban population and to a greater extent for rural population (Table 2). So, life expectancy at birth for rural population has increased in more extent in the region than in country.

Table 2 - Standardized mortality and life expectancy at birth (LE) of the urban and rural population in the Nizhny Novgorod region and the Russian Federation and their growth for the period 2003 - 2016 (European standard)
Indicators Nizhny Novgorod region Russian Federation
men women men women
City
Death rate in 2016 1579.2 1104.1 1356.1 1025.4
Growth rate (%) -34.6 -29.7 -35.7 -31.2
LE0 in 2016 64.7 76.8 66.4 77.1
Growth (years) 7.6 5.3 7.9 5.3
LE60 in 2016 14.9 21.2 16.3 21.9
Growth (years) 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.3
Rural areas
Death rate in 2016 1526.2 1109.9 1449.8 1086.7
Growth rate (%) -39.3 -30.5 -35.8 -30.7
LE0 in 2016 64.7 75.8 65.4 76.2
Growth (years) 8.8 5.8 7.9 5.2
LE60 in 2016 15.4 21.4 15.9 21.4
Growth (years) 3.5 3.0 3.3 3.1

In compare with the country indexes, in analyzed region Life expectancy at 60 years old is less for urban residents and close for rural residents, and Life expectancy at birth is less for each area.

Among urban residents, the proportions of those, who did not come to physicians during more than three years, are 12.8% for men and 11.6% for women while among rural people they are 50.6% and 45.5% (p <0.0001).

Among all elderly, the proportion of urban residents, who cannot service themselves, is twice as large as the index for countryside (Table 3). For long-lived people these proportions are much larger, especially for men. The difference is statistically significant for long-lived men and women (p <0.0001). That means than rural residents remain active in self-service longer than townspeople.

Table 3: Proportions of elderly people who cannot service themselves (%)
Age group City Rural areas
men women men women
Total 11.1 11.6 4.7 6.2
Long-lived
(85 years and older)
42.2 37.6 10.4 11.5

During a survey of persons of retirement age it was determined that only a small part of the population has no chronic illnesses (Table 4).

Table 4: Proportion of elderly people who did not have any diseases and comparison error
  City Rural areas P
Men 0.74% 0.26% 0.003
Women 1.05% 0.31% < 0.001

We calculated the number of chronic diseases per person. In the city, the number of chronic pathologies of different organs and systems per one person of elderly age are: 2.83 for man and 2.76 for woman of elderly ages, 3.06 and 3.07 respectively for senile ages, 2.71 and 2.75 of advanced ages. In rural areas, the analyzed indicators for men and women are respectively 1.64 and 1.58 for elderly ages, 1.84 and 1.78 for senile ages, 1.86 and 1.84 for advanced ages.

As we see for senile age group, for urban residents the number of chronic diseases is at one and a half times more than for rural population. In rural areas, there is an increase in the number of chronic diseases with age, and we don`t see anything like this for city population. For urban residents of senile age with about three chronic diseases per person, the probability to live long are less than for people of this age with two chronic diseases.

Urban citizens, who cannot service themselves, have fewer illnesses per person than elderly people in total (Table 5). Among villagers, there is an opposite situation.

Table 5: Average number of chronic diseases per pensioner in the city and rural areas
  City Rural areas
men women men women
Total 2.89 2.85 1.70 1.69
People who cannot service themselves 2.54 2.68 1.84 1.87

Using received data, we calculated the prevalence of chronic diseases among observed population. Its compare in three age groups of pensioners showed that neoplasms, endocrine, musculoskeletal and respiratory diseases among urban long-lived residents are less common than among senile age group (Table 6A). Note, among urban residents aged 85 and over, the prevalence of circulatory and nerve diseases is paradoxically less than among younger pensioners.

Table 6A: Prevalence of chronic diseases of different classes (per 1000 surveyed) among persons of considered elderly (<75), senile (75–84) and long-lived (85+) ages in Nizhny Novgorod city
Classes of diseases Males Females
<75 75-84 >85 <75 75-84 >85
Infectious and parasitic diseases 3.6 2.0 13.6 5.2 4.9 2.2
Neoplasms 10.8 30.0 20.4 10.8 30.7 17.7
Blood diseases 4.8 6.0 0.0 5.0 4.9 17.7
Endocrine diseases 145.7 164.0 122.4 162.1 243.5 221.2
Mental disorders 2.4 2.0 6.8 1.0 3.2 2.2
Nerve diseases 21.7 10.0 6.8 27.0 12.9 2.2
Eye diseases 125.2 92.0 183.7 113.9 119.7 161.5
Ear diseases 15.1 56.0 6.8 10.2 10.5 13.3
Circulatory diseases 1973.5 1960.0 1680.3 1982.7 2201.5 1911.5
Respiratory diseases 22.9 84.0 54.4 19.9 68.0 48.7
Digestive diseases 161.3 150.0 190.5 187.0 136.7 168.1
Musculoskeletal diseases 427.5 240.0 217.7 231.1 216.8 154.9
Genitourinary diseases 112.6 264.0 204.1 8.4 12.1 28.8

Among rural long-lived residents, as well as among the townspeople of this age, there are fewer neoplasms and endocrine diseases (Table 6B). Respiratory and musculoskeletal diseases are less common among rural long-lived males only. Also, long-lived males and females are less likely to have blood and genitourinary diseases. Prevalence of nerve and circulatory diseases among rural long-livers is greater than among younger pensioners, that is consistent with biological laws of these diseases development.

Table 6B: Prevalence of chronic diseases of different classes (per 1000 surveyed) among persons of considered elderly (<75), senile (75–84) and long-lived (85+) ages in rural areas
Classes of diseases Males Females
<75 75-84 >85 <75 75-84 >85
Infectious and parasitic diseases 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Neoplasms 30.3 36.0 30.8 32.5 44.1 28.9
Blood diseases 3.5 0.9 0.0 2.7 1.8/td> 0.8
Endocrine diseases 74.0 86.5 30.8 80.0 99.5 87.6
Mental disorders 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.6
Nerve diseases 4.9 6.3 30.8 4.1 10.8 31.3
Eye diseases 2.2 4.5 3.8 1.6 7.5 5.6
Ear diseases 0.3 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 4.0
Circulatory diseases 1209.4 1316.2 1376.9 1192.2 1329.0 1343.8
Respiratory diseases 40.4 42.3 34.6 22.6 25.2 34.5
Digestive diseases 132.4 173.0 203.8 127.0 146.5 163.9
Musculoskeletal diseases 118.8 136.9 130.8 105.6 101.3 131.7
Genitourinary diseases 23.2 32.4 15.4 11.3 14.7 8.8

In compare to urban residents, among rural residents, the prevalence of neoplasms is greater, and the prevalence of blood, endocrine, nerve, circulatory, respiratory, musculoskeletal and genitourinary diseases is less.

However, the ratio of urban and rural death rates is opposite for almost all these disease classes. Despite the large prevalence of neoplasms among rural residents, their mortality is less than in city (Table 6). With a greater prevalence among urban residents of nerve diseases, mortality from them is higher among rural residents. The same is for male mortality from circulatory, respiratory and musculoskeletal diseases. Death rates for blood and genitourinary diseases in city and villages are close.

Table 6: Death rates of urban and rural population of retirement age in the Nizhny Novgorod region, 2016 (European standard, per 100,000 population)
Classes of diseases City Rural areas
Males Females Males Females
Infectious and parasitic diseases 16.3 4.4 6.2 1.2
Neoplasms 1105.1 408.2 808.8 238.2
Blood diseases 253.0 194.2 231.0 195.3
Endocrine diseases 4.7 3.2 3.1 1.3
Mental disorders 16.5 5.9 31.8 30.3
Nerve diseases 936.4 650.0 1182.9 759.6
Circulatory diseases 3182.4 1708.2 2772.1 1429.4
Respiratory diseases 248.4 49.4 279.3 44.3
Digestive diseases 276.8 130.6 217.4 119.0
Musculoskeletal diseases 1.9 4.1 3.2 2.4
Genitourinary diseases 53.5 27.7 52.3 31.3
Total 6683.6 3651.5 6284.7 3549.8

So, the structure of death causes does not adequately reflect the prevalence of chronic diseases and cannot serve as a basis for studying the population's need for specialized medical care in the field of gerontology.

We calculated average rank for self-reported health status during last year by residents of cities and villages for analyzed age groups using a scale of: 1 is excellent, 2 are good, 3 is satisfactory, 4 is bad.

For urban pensioners under the age of 75 this rank is more optimistic than for rural ones. However, urban long-livers have rated their health less optimistically than rural ones (Fig. 1).

JLHD-17-1140-Fig1

Figure 1: Average self-reported health status during last year by residents of cities and villages for different age groups (evaluation on a scale of 1 excellent, 2 good, 3 satisfactory, 4 bad)

It is possible that due to poor access to medical help, rural residents by the beginning of retirement age have learned to perceive malaises as ? constant background of their life.

Demonstrating the difference in the phenotypic manifestations of the genes of predisposition to chronic diseases in old age between the city and village, the results make it possible to produce the following assumptions. First, better access to medical care does not guarantee the better health status of the elderly, while it contributes to an increase in the life expectancy of men. Second, in spite of better access to health care, urban lifestyle contributes to the accumulation of chronic diseases in population of a region. Third, if chronic pathology of three different classes of diseases presented, then the probability of a long life is fundamentally determined by the access to health care. Fourth, the probability of longevity is significantly reduced in result of illness by neoplasms, respiratory, endocrine or genitourinary diseases in combine with cardiovascular or nerve diseases.

  1. Anisimov VN, Serpov VYu, Finagentov AV, et al. Novyy etap razvitiya gerontologii i geriatrii v Rossii: problemy sozdaniya sistemy geriatricheskoy pomoshchi. Chast' 2. Struktura sistemy, nauchnyy podkhod [A new stage in the development of gerontology and geriatrics in Russia: the problems of creating a system of geriatric care. Part 2. The structure of the system, the scientific approach]. Advances in Gerontology. 2017; 30(4): 486-497 (In Russian)
  2. Baranov VS, Baranova EV. Geneticheskiye aspekty stareniya [Genetic aspects of aging] Advances in Gerontology. 2007; 20(2): 26-34. (In Russian)
  3. Baranov VS, Baranova EV. Geneticheskiy pasport — osnova aktivnogo dolgoletiya i maksimal'noy prodolzhitel'nosti zhizni [The genetic passport is the basis of active longevity and maximum life expectancy]. Advances in Gerontology. 2009; 22(1): 84-91. (In Russian)
  4. Bashkireva AS. Innovatsionnyye gerontotekhnologii v razvitii strategii deystviy v interesakh grazhdan starshego pokoleniya v RF [Innovative gerontotechnologies in the development of an action strategy in the interests of citizens of the older generation in the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Roszdravnadzora. 2016; (4): 19-24. (In Russian)
  5. Vertkin AL, Rumyantseva MA, Skotnikova AS. Komorbidnost' [Comorbidity]. Clinical medicine. 2012; (10): 4-11. (In Russian)
  6. Dobrokhleb VG. Resursnyy potentsial pozhilogo naseleniya Rossii [Resource potential of the elderly population of Russia]. Sociological research. 2008; (8): 55-61. (In Russian)
  7. Kaurov BA, Matyukhina EB. Osobennosti chastotnogo spektra zabolevaniy i polimorbidnosti u pozhilykh lyudey i dolgozhiteley [Features of the frequency spectrum of diseases and polymorbidity in the elderly and long-livers]. Clinical gerontology. 2014; 20(1-2): 66-71. (In Russian)
  8. Kirshchina IA, Gabdrafikova YuS. Kharakteristika polimorbidnykh sostoyaniy i otsenka polipragmazii u zhenshchin v geriatricheskoy praktike [Characteristics of polymorbid conditions and evaluation of polypharmacy in women in geriatric practice]. Siberian Medical Journal (Irkutsk). 2014; 131(8): 67-70. (In Russian)
  9. Lazebnik LB. Stareniye i polimorbidnost' [Aging and polymorbidity]. Consilium medicum. 2005; 7(12): 993-996. (In Russian)
  10. Mitrofanov IM, Nikolaev YuA, Dolgova NA, et al. Regional'nyye osobennosti polimorbidnosti v sovremennoy klinike vnutrennikh bolezney [Regional features of polymorbidity in a modern clinic of internal diseases]. Clinical medicine. 2013; (6): 26-29. (In Russian)
  11. Ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii demograficheskoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2025 goda: Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 09.10.07 ? 1351 [On the approval of the Concept of the Demographic Policy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 1351 of October 9, 2007] [electronic resource] URL: http://base.garant.ru/191961 (cited 25.01.2018). (In Russian)
  12. Proshchayev KI, Ilnitsky AN, Postnikova AN. Klinicheskaya patologiya polimorbidnosti v geriatricheskoy praktike. [Clinical pathology of polymorbidity in geriatric practice]. Advances in Gerontology. 2011; 24(2): 285-289. (In Russian)
  13. Semyonova VG. Obratnyy epidemiologicheskiy perekhod v Rossii [Reverse epidemiological transition in Russia]. Moscow: CSP. 2005. 287 p. (In Russian)
  14. Shabalin VN. Organizatsiya raboty geriatricheskoy sluzhby v usloviyakh progressiruyushchego demograficheskogo stareniya naseleniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Organization of the work of the geriatric service in the conditions of the progressive demographic aging of the population of the Russian Federation]. Advances in Gerontology. 2009; 22(1): 185-195. (In Russian)
 

Article Info

Article Notes

  • Published on: July 25, 2018

Keywords

  • Multimorbidity

  • Prevalence of Chronic Diseases
  • Self-Esteem of A Health State
  • Persons of Advanced Age
  • Persons of Senile Age
  • Structure of Morbidity

*Correspondence:

Dr. TP Sabgayda
Federal Research Institute for Health Organization and Informatics of Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
11 Dobrolyubova Str., Moscow, 127254, Russia
Email: tsabgaida@mail.ru